When it comes to Taylor Swift and the world, there are basically two camps: giggling Swifties who will buy everything, and those desperately trying to escape the Swift Media Industrial Complex. There are precious few who exist between those extremes.
But as far as Taylor Swift’s superfan strategy goes, the game plan is simple: super-serve the first group, and ignore the second. And it’s a strategy that is working like none other in the history of the music industry.
For those in the second camp, locked in a daily struggle to tune all things-Taylor out, a big piece of the onslaught may not be obvious. Because underneath Taylor Swift’s record-setting four million-plus sales of The Life of a Showgirl is an absolute, WWII-level production blitz of stuff, all relentlessly hawked to Swiftie superfans.
That includes endless LP, CD, cassette, and digital download variations — up to 40 different variations according to DMN’s latest count — with Swifties snatching up multiple copies with little-to-no price sensitivity. And that’s not even counting the onslaught of album-themed merch, including sweatshirts, jewelry, t-shirts, hats, keychains, guitar picks — and concert tickets.
So is that the music industry’s superfan strategy: just flood the box with endless crap?
Yes, it is. Any questions?
Actually, that’s not entirely fair. There are entire startups, with millions in backing, focused on unlocking the superfan riddle (as tallied by DMN Pro). On a broader scale, platforms like Spotify have been perpetually puzzled by how to cater to the most dedicated music aficionado superfans.
A sampling of Taylor’s ‘The Life of a Showgirl’ physical variations (Photo: Reddit)Overseas, K-pop’s been on this train for years, with superstar groups hawking endless CD variations, wands, and other paraphernalia with smashing success. Now, those winds are blowing westward.
Ahead of Taylor Swift’s record-setting album sales week, Adele was the diva to beat. She previously held the record for first-week album sales, with 3.5 million copies of 25 shifted back in 2015. But Adele’s strategy was the extreme opposite of Taylor’s on Life of a Showgirl.
Adele fans may remember that 25 wasn’t even available on streaming platforms. Instead, there was simply a limited, old-school physical release strategy. If fans wanted the album, they had to buy it the old-fashioned way.
Backing that into Luminate/Billboard’s sales-counting methodology, that hiked up sales tremendously, given that physical albums carry far more weight than ‘equivalent’ stream-counts that arbitrarily equal an ‘album’.
That is, streaming numbers were through the roof, with endless physical variations spiking the numbers into the stratosphere. LP, CD, cassette, and other variations included exclusive acoustic versions, voice memos, and even jewelry, all of which required Swifties to obey once again — by opening their wallets wide open.
But Taylor Swift isn’t an outlier — she’s just the most prominent example of a trend that’s been growing for years. Indeed, we’re hearing from more labels, managers, and artists themselves that blitzing physical variations to superfans is a strategy that’s working.
The first was scarcity.
In the case of Swift, the concept was taken to an extreme with 24-hour sales windows. But the general idea is to keep quantities and associated windows limited.
The second pro-tip that emerged was to, well, throw a bunch of crap into the marketplace and see what sticks.
In many cases, we’re hearing that most of the avalanche-of-stuff doesn’t sell, but the small percentage that outperforms makes up for it all. This is backed up by some data: according to a recent Luminate study, 93% of sales from album-version blitzes came from the five most popular variations.
And the third?
One manager cautioned smaller or emerging artists against overspending on physical product that they might not recoup. The Taylor Swift example is noteworthy, but of course, few artists have that level of marketing muscle and spending power to blitz the marketplace.
But blitzing the marketplace they are: per the same Luminate study, the average number of physical variants surrounding the top ten-selling albums jumped from 3.3 in 2019 to 8.9 in 2023. It sounds crazy, but Swift is likely single-handedly bumping that number up in 2025, if not saving the entire US-based vinyl sales story this year.
But splice the data by specific artist, and targeted physical releases look like a lucrative growth strategy. Even more eye-popping: study after study continues to show that a majority of LP buyers don’t even play (or even unwrap) their purchased vinyl.
For the dedicated superfan, it’s really more about the collectible and artist attachment than anything else.